Session 2: Advancing Monitoring Approaches to Enhance Tidal Chesapeake Bay Habitat Assessment
April 22, 2022 - April 22, 2022This workshop convened virtually on Friday April 22nd. for the second of three total workshop sessions.
Save the Date: Save the Date, April 22
The workshop was the second of three total workshop sessions and focused on gaps and cost challenges limiting habitat assessments as outlined by the water quality standards under the TMDL for water clarity/Chlorophyll a. Other sessions were:
- On December 9, 2021, which focused on Water Clarity/SAV.
- On May 11, 2022, which focused on Water Clarity/Dissolved Oxygen.
Over the last 18 years, analytical methods have been published (e.g., USEPA 2017) attempting to offer options and opportunities to extend the utility of available, traditional biweekly to monthly fixed station monitoring data, shallow water continuous monitoring data, or Dataflow collected water quality monitoring program data to fill assessment gaps. However, gaps remain in collecting monitoring data at appropriate temporal and spatial scales for providing a full accounting of bay health in all habitats. Further, new data collection programs involving Citizen Science derived data and satellite sensed water quality offer opportunities to improve accounting where space-time gaps have existed.
Workshop Objectives:
The workshop objective was to develop actionable recommendations on adaptive monitoring and assessment for the next generation Chesapeake Bay Program tidal monitoring program. Adaption will need to occur with methods that 1) improve temporal resolution in water quality data collections to address the full spectrum of characterizing conditions defining living resource life cycle needs, 2) improve spatial resolution to provide information needs on spatial variability in water quality and represent diverse tidal water habitats, 3) improve efficiency and cost effectiveness associated with data collections to expand the information return on data collection investment 4) advance water quality assessment efficiency and effectiveness with adopting applications of evolving intelligent algorithms applied to interpreting alternative data collection sources (e.g., aerial imagery, e.g., satellite-derived data), and 6) updating Bay habitat assessment tools (e.g., the Bay Interpolator) for more effectively using diverse data sources to improve habitat characterization at all management-relevant temporal and spatial scales addressing cross-cutting decision-support needs of Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Implementation Teams.
Agenda_STAC Advanced Monitoring Water Clarity_CHLA
Steering Committee:
- Peter Tango, Chair, USGS, STAR Co-coordinator, Chair of the Criteria Assessment Protocol Workgroup
- Tish Robertson, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
- Bill Dennison, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, STAC
- Brooke Landry, Maryland Department of Natural Resources
- Mark Trice, Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Presentations:
- State Water Clarity Assessment Review:
- MD Water Clarity Assessment — Mark Trice (MD DNR), David Parrish (VIMS)
- DC Water Clarity Assessment — Nicoline Shulterbrandt (DOEE)
- Resources and Insights for Extending to Baywide Annual Clarity-related Analyses:
- Short and long-term station-specific CHLA secchi trends — Rebecca Murphy (UMCES)
- Remote sensing of Water Clarity in the Chesapeake Bay: Advantages and disadvantages — Jessie Turner (UConn and VIMS)
Ocean Remote Sensing: Background Info: presented by Jessie Turner. This video provided background information as part of a college course called “Ocean Remote Sensing & Global Change” in Spring 2020.
- Resources and Insights for Extending to Baywide Annual Clarity-related Analyses (Continued)
- Modeling Coastal Water Clarity – algorithms and monitoring needs to support continued development—Sarah Lang (University of Rhode Island)
- NOAA satellite-based product for Chesapeake Bay clarity/research — Ron Vogel (East Coast CoastWatch)
- State Chlorophyll a Assessment Review:
- MD Chlorophyll a Assessment—Slides prepared by Matt Stover (MDE)
- VA Chlorophyll a Assessment – Tish Robertson
- Resources for Chlorophyll a-related Analyses:
- Short and long-term station-specific CHLA secchi trends — Rebecca Murphy (UMCES)
- USGS satellite-based CHLA assessment for Chesapeake Bay — Kendull Wnuk (USGS)
- NOAA satellite-based CHLA assessment for Chesapeake Bay – Michelle Tomlinson (NOAA)
For more information, please contact Meg Cole, STAC Coordinator, at colem@chesapeake.org.